The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Happy to provide a copy to anyone interested in developing the content towards a merger Vanamonde (Talk) 22:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Eadeh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person (fails WP:BASIC) and the material about the controversy that the subject was recently involved in violates WP:DEL-REASON#9 Flaughtin (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of WP:BIO notability whatsoever; with regards to pre-cleanup version of article, WP:NOTNEWS applies. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:11, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a low level government employee with no signs of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NOTE,WP:BASIC. --SalmanZ (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Not-notable person.Ms.bletvok (talk) 21:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and merge with Hong Kong's Gang of Four This individual seems to be the exemplar of why WP:BLP1E exists. Contrary to the article creator's assertion, being a career diplomat does not make one a public person. But as there is no accusation of a crime detailed in the article, WP:BLPCRIME does not apply (I bring this up as the nominator cited that in edit summaries on the article and I don't think it's actually relevant here). That said, as every bit of notability she has stems from her meeting with Demositso, an the publicity that garnered, she's only notable for one event, which makes her inappropriate for an independent article. However, there's ample reliable coverage of her involvement in this notable event within the Hong Kong protests for inclusion of any relevant and reliably sourced material to be included there. I should note that there is substantial Chinese language coverage in a variety of sources that mention her. It's all about this event. The argument that the content itself violates WP:DEL-REASON #9 seems like over-reach. However there's no evidence of independent notability. Finally, a word of caution, as the creator of this article is an SPA with a strong POV, I'd recommend that when content regarding this event is merged into the appropriate article, that it be done through consultation at article talk and / or at WP:BLP/N prior to inclusion in main space. BLP is a complicated area of Wikipedia, and new users frequently run afoul of expectations there. Simonm223 (talk) 12:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I received contact from the page creator who claims they don't actually know how to reply to AfDs (as they are very new). They claim they have evidence of notability to present though I've told them I'm skeptical of that. But let's not close this discussion too speedily. We don't want to WP:BITE the newbies. Simonm223 (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.