Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny (The Room)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Johnny (The Room) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not nearly enough in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sourcing to show real world notability. Onel5969 TT me 14:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Unnecessary article split. There's not enough to establish independent notability, and everything about the character directly is tied to the film anyway. TTN (talk) 15:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - This page does not really have any reliable or noteworthy sources. I also agree that it does not establish notability. Cardei012597 (talk) 06:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: There is a reception, but it seems to be based on very niche source that do not discuss this character in depth. I'd suggest merging the reception (minus the OR claim that all reviews were negative) to the article about the film then redirect or just delete this as an unlikely search term. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per User:Piotrus. The current reception isn't really up to standards, as the sources aren't reliable, and the coverage isn't really WP:SIGCOV as described in our WP:GNG. A lot of this is already duplicated at the article about the film itself. There isn't anything to support a stand alone article. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.