The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jett Rink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable with IndyWeek being the best coverage they ever got and my searches found here and here. With no good move target and no hopes of improvement, there's nothing to suggest keeping this. SwisterTwister talk 00:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:15, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not enough coverage in third party sources to meet notability standards. The Undead Never Die (talk) 02:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.