Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Wade
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jess_Wade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failure to meet notability guidelines for academic individuals. See talk page.
Local labrat (talk) 22:54, 26 July 2018 (UTC) — Local labrat (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Speedy keep. See Academic writes 270 Wikipedia pages in a year to get female scientists noticed, an article in a WP:RS source specifically about her. Narky Blert (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Physics-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:BASIC having received international coverage. Andrew D. (talk) 23:17, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Understood. I withdrawal my AFD.Local labrat (talk) 00:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.