Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Barth
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 21:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- James Barth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability, not even a credible claim of significance in the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as all of this is questionable for his better own article. SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 05:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This person exists but seems not to be notable. The only reference in the article mentions him only in passing, and I was unable to find anything better. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per above. InsertCleverPhraseHere 11:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.