The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G7 by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isaric Christian Brotherhood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability per WP:ORG; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested without comment by article's creator, with comment at the article's talk page. Altered Walter (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• delete no independent evidence of notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The group's notability is that it is one of the only Jewish Christian groups in the world's most populous Islamic nation. Its voice may be small, but it doesn't deserve to be snuffed out by Western editors looking for Western style sourcing/referencing and media/internet coverage. Judeo-Christian micro-minorities don't enjoy that kind of luxury in Indonesia. Isar101 (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: With apologies to the creator of the article, but if there are no "Western-style" sources, we can't be convinced that it really exists, so we can't have an article on it. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 19:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I didn't realize that creating the article would be so problematic. Perhaps it's best for it to be deleted afterall. Isar101 (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Checked sources and can't see any English reference to this new religion(?), apart from their own website. . If there is non English references, please feel free to post, but it would be unusual. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:30, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a new "religion", just a more recently started branch/denomination of the Christian religion. Isar101 (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I realize now that it's too soon to have a Wikipedia article about it. Thanks anyway to those who helped in editing it and giving advice to me on how to work with articles here on Wikipedia. Isar101 (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I think this is a case of WP:SNOW by now, as the article's creator and sole content contributor (also the only "keep" voter) has voted for deletion. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 14:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Nominated for G7 per Isar101's delete request. Mkdw^talk 22:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.