The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. -Splash - tk 23:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was {{prod}}'d for a time, but I think it needs a wider audience for deleting it. UtherSRG (talk) 15:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - prod reason was "no evidence of notability" Yomangani^talk 15:25, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Pare down, but keep The article is basically ad copy and is way too long, but it appears to be a notable piece of software. Some reviews: [1], [2], [3], [4]. 209,000 GHits, which isn't super impressive for downloadable software, but good enough. - Richfife 16:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - virtually all article is an advertisement (except probably the generic first sentence). Also the product is fairly unknown, and Wikipedia shouldn't be used to promote it. Futurix 17:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep if it's edited and ad copy removed. JubalHarshaw 03:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable piece of software. Dockingman 04:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - non-notable, advert. Michael K. Edwards 09:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable; Wiki is not Google. - Corporal Tunnel 20:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.