The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Big Brother Canada houseguests (season 2)#Ika. Material is already contained elsewhere and there is consensus that it isn't standalone notable. (non-admin closure) ansh666 02:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ika Wong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent notability. I redirected the article, per WP:ATD, to an appropriate target and it was reverted with a lovely all-caps edit summary of "VANDALISM" from the article creator. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was vandalism. Deletion is up for discussion, you can't just redirect it without a consensus. musicalorange6 (talk} 15:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you read WP:ATD, you'll see that redirection is appropriate and no consensus is required. It's not vandalism - it's responsible editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete / Merge Fails WP:ANYBIO (by a mile, actually); no WP:PERSISTENT coverage in any WP:DEPTH by WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Passing mentions in mostly blogs, zines and tabloids still only focus on the one event: WP:BLP1E applies. To put it another way, there probably is a universe in which shredding people's letters is of encyclopaedic value... but this sure as hell aint it. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 16:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete/Redirect: Completely non-notable. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 05:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.