Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid Sexuality Scale
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. DGG ( talk ) 05:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hybrid Sexuality Scale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- no indication of this scales use anywhere. IP editor states on talk page that he has access to the journals cited, and this scale does not appear in them. delete as OR or something made up one day. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 23:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This appears to be a variant of the Kinsey scale, but isn't supported by the references supplied. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 00:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy, allow user to improve further upon the page and its complementary sourcing standards through additional research. — Cirt (talk) 01:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It depends IMO, userfying is never a good idea. Generally the articles get forgotten about and never touched again. How about we look on the internet, and work out how encyclopedic the topic is? If it is encyclopedic, either leave it as it is, or delete everything and replace it with a short verifiable stub. If the topic is inherently not suitable for an encyclopedia, then delete.--Coin945 (talk) 04:58, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:V. It really does sound like a WP:OR derivation from Kinsey scale. If I see published scholarship to the contrary, I will reconsider.--Milowent • hasspoken 18:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.