The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hayman Trophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been added to WP:PROD three times, first on 1 October 2018 by both David Biddulph and Harrias; then by me yesterday. GB fan has advised me that it must go to AFD as there has been a previous PROD. The 2018 PRODs said: "No evidence of WP:Notability" (David) and "Appears to be a regional tournament without significant notability. Definitely not first-class, as claimed" (Harrias). In my PROD, I said: "Local event of no wider importance. Fails WP:GNG". I think all the PROD comments are valid and that this article should go. The tournament could perhaps be mentioned in Bihar Cricket Association. Batagur baska (talk) 14:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Batagur baska (talk) 14:36, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only stuff worth keeping is probably the first paragraph, which appears at least vaguely sourced. I doubt we need that paragraph as a stand alone article. This would probably be better off redirected to somewhere like Cricket in India I imagine Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I searched for Cricket in Bihar, only to find it is a disambiguation page! Batagur baska (talk) 21:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Bihar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. StickyWicket aka AA (talk) 00:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• del unverifiable notability. - Altenmann >talk 23:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• I had forgotten about this. I found this section in the BCA article and it had no introduction, so I have copied the first two sentences of the article to there. I suppose that might count as a merge and there is nothing else of any use so it's just a question of redirecting or deleting the article. Thank you, everyone. Batagur baska (talk) 08:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.