Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ha Seung-moo
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ha Seung-moo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Prod contested without explanation. No indication that this Korean poet is notable. There is an article on ja:河承武, but it isn't much help. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 10:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Korean Wik article is quite extensive (for a Korean Wik entry). It is evidence to keep the entry. Kdammers (talk) 11:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean this page? -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 13:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 13:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 13:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I can't find any English-language sources online (for whatever that's worth), but the Korean wiki entry—while not "evidence" of anything—makes me feel inclined to give this the benefit of the doubt. This discussion really needs the input of someone who can read and understand Korean, so I'll ask over at WP:KOREA. PC78 (talk) 16:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Caspian Blue. PC78 (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable poet. Only news/info from third parties in Korean are just to mention his name along with other colleague writers.[1] The info on Korean Wikipedia would be "self-promotion".--Caspian blue 15:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.