The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Green Acres, Delaware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill subdivision fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Although the article is more than just a stub, it's sourced almost entirely to the neighborhood civic association with no significant independent coverage. The only newspaper results I'm finding are real estate listings and articles about the local swim team. –dlthewave ☎ 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 19:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This wasn't hard to find: https://eu.delawareonline.com/story/life/home-garden/2014/03/19/green-acres-split-levels-reminiscent-of-frank-lloyd-wright-style/6611723/ tho the article in Architectural Forum in which the community is discussed doesn't seem to be on line, but is independent coverage. Djflem (talk) 19:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems to pass WP:GEOLAND between the sources in the article and Djflem's comment above.4meter4 (talk) 20:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Meets GEOLAND, has some architectural significance. Subdivisions are hit-or-miss but I think this one is notable. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 01:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets GEOLAND. Djflem (talk) 06:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: most of these geostubs are nothing beyond a GNIS entry, but this seems to be fairly fleshed out and has a number of actual sources talking about the history of the place. jp×g 20:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.