The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Global Group Enterprise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a group with no secondary sources to establish notability. It's been up for quite a while, and I've seen an editor has removed some copyright violations. If it doesn't meet the general notability guideline, should it be considered for deletion? Minimac (talk) 12:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Google News search finds only in-passing mentions and press releases, all four of them. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No reliable sources found which establish anything but their existence and some job openings, nothing for notability. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--Nuujinn (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.