The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gilbert schema for Ulysses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. May be worth transwikiing.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:31, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• See also related AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linati schema for Ulysses. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Google Books shows numerous results for the Gilbert schema in reliable academic books. If the schema is best on Wikipedia, Wikisource or Wikibooks is an interesting question for the article talk page, but the Gilbert schema is clearly notable for AfD nom purposes. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AutomaticStrikeout (₵) 01:20, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per User:Green Cardamom. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.