The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (procedural close). Was deleted on 14:49, 24 November 2014 by User:Ponyo (CSD G5: Mass deletion of pages added by User:TheAmandaShowPlease) Natg 19 (talk) 20:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting the Kinks Out (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not enough independent coverage found to justify an article at this time. may be recreated nearer to opening date. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as it'll be released in January 2015 so personally see no point deleting. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I see no point in deleting but hey if everyone wants to make life hard work then delete it shall be. –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 03:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I was going to suggest userfying it, but that plot section was a close paraphrase of the film website's synopsis section, so I removed it; hence, there's not really anything to userfy. Delete for now, if it gets the coverage to meet WP:NFILM when it's released then it can be recreated. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 04:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete per failure of WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Apparently this is still filming, and has not received a level of coverage that would meet that guideline. I improved it some, but it can always be recreated or undeleted when notability can be established. And Dylan... not a biggie, but a plot does not confer a notability and could have been used from the official source under WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:FILMPLOT if it had been properly attributed. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MichaelQSchmidt - I wasn't concerned about the film's website being used a source for the plot summary, it's that it was a copyvio, hence removed :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as a product of the indeffed Clairestandish sockfarm. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The article's author TheAmandaShowPlease is not listed as a confirmed sock at the investigation link you offered. However, there is an OPEN investigation HERE... results are still pending. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:13, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Now confirmed, and article has been speedied under WP:G5. If it ever returns, we should ensure it is re-created by a non-sock editor, and not negatively judge any appropriate topic over the bad-faith actions of the sockfarm. IE: If it beocmes notable enough for an article in the future, it becomes notable. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.