The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 17:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General Suppression Control Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I doubt this concept passes the notability requirement. The article includes four references, all by the same group of authors. There is very little to be found on Google. Web of Science only lists two of the four papers, but it does not have any articles referring to them.

I asked the author for comment on User talk:Aux1496 four weeks ago, but I didn't receive a response. The only other edits of the author was to add some of the same references to Artificial immune system. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 08:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Where is the notibility? There are thousands of papers like that. No wide spread usage or acceptance seen.--Dacium 08:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All 4 of the articles are published in non peer-reviewed sources. Wouldn't justify an article about any of them, let alone a new concept. About as NN as a concept can be. DGG 01:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• This discussion has been added as a test case to the proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (science). ~ trialsanderrors 22:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.