The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing in favour of delete per WP:QUORUM and WP:BIODELETE. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gammer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Transfer following procedural close of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Gammer: the original nomination by Apriestofgix was "WP:DEL7 WP:DEL8." Ricky81682 (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Ricky81682: for correcting the template. To respond to the questions on the original page. Currently this article has absolutely no sourced information. Also the notability of Gammer is extremely low. Apriestofgix (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as searches found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.