Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gail Symmons
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I think by WP:SNOW, the result was going to be to delete anyway. The original editor requested deletion via a message on the talk page, so it also qualifies for deletion under speedy criterion G7. —C.Fred (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gail Symmons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article dodges speedy deletion under A7 by being about a fictional radio host and not the webcast itself. However, the article is the complete fictional history of the character. It does nothing to demonstrate the character's real-world notability, nor does it provide a single source (much less a reliable one). —C.Fred (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article is written of a fictional character (based on a real person). We aren't finished with the article yet and will be adding references. --Jamesbream (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd suggest adding the references now. That way, other users can assist in building the article. —C.Fred (talk) 16:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails notability and verifiability criteria for a start. Author(s) should be politely pointed in the direction of WP:COI and WP:OWN as well as the usual beginner help files like WP:N, WP:V, etc. Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No reliables sources could be found or are provided in article to extablish notability Captain-tucker (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article doesn't even mention what work this character is from. Google wasn't much help, a few hits from youtube. Looks to be WP:MADEUP. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.