The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-26 15:02Z

Football ticket prices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Just a list of football (soccer) ticket prices. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Previously prodded but was contested Qwghlm 11:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, especially a collection that is inaccurate and gives no context. Nuttah68 11:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nomination. This is definitely shaping up to be an indiscriminate collection of numbers. - fchd 12:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. MER-C 13:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT (indiscriminate) and WP:That'sNice.., this belongs on a football website, not an encyclopedia. QuagmireDog 14:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Potentially the title can be expanded to an encyclopedic article, with history, economic, social etc. researches. But I strongly doubt that from the actual list we can improve the article. Cate | _Talk 15:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 15:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the same, I'd be delighted to see an article on this subject with sources etc. Problem is, once someone's latched onto something and has started list-list-listing, making an article from it would mean pulling the plug and starting afresh anyways :/ QuagmireDog 17:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think a general article on the economics of football would be a good thing - but it definitely wouldn't be this. So I would go along with starting afresh as well. Qwghlm 14:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOT and unencylopedic. Davidpdx 10:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.