The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Subject of BLP agrees to deletion, no keep !votes. J04n(talk page) 22:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Faye Jackson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo, not meeting GNG. Undergraduates are not notable unless they have extensive coverage in media. Having your work "recognized" does not mean winning an award. I find no mentions of this individual. Oaktree b (talk) 00:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, and Mathematics. Oaktree b (talk) 00:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. For one thing, because the only notability here is academic, it's entirely from undergraduate student awards, and our guideline for academic notability explicitly states that awards and honors for academic student achievements (at either high school, undergraduate or graduate level) do not qualify. For another, because it puts an inappropriate level of pressure on someone presumably about to start graduate study to publicize their academic achievements in this way. Wait a few years until they've started to establish themselves. Incidentally, we might also want to take a closer look at Letong (Carina) Hong, another very recent winner of the same award (not for purposes of comparison in this AfD – see WP:WAX – but as another case where similar reasoning is likely to apply.) —David Eppstein (talk) 01:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as per David. Hopefully in a few years she will be back with a better case for inclusion. McKay (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete No real claim to meeting WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 10:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete As Faye Jackson herself, I also recommend deletion :)

I didn't create the article myself. Although a non-academic friend of mine did on a whim after seeing that previous winners of the Schafer prize had a page. After reading the notability requirements it definitely doesn't fit! Alittledelta (talk) 18:46, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.