The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. T. Canens (talk) 13:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fantom (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable small company. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. The company is Irish and a WP:BEFORE search in several mainstream Irish news/media sources (like RTÉ, Irish Independent, TheJournal.ie, etc) returns nothing at all. I can find only one "opinion/comment/analysis" piece (effectively an interview with the founder) in The Irish Examiner in 2013. Which, in addition to failing WP:SIRS and WP:INTERVIEW/N, barely establishes that the company then had just 5 employees and some very moderate aspirations to gain a few dozen clients that year. One of the few/only pieces in The Irish Times is also quite short and simply deals with a funding round which valued the company at barely 1 million EUR. Again, hardly a massive indicator of notability/relevance. That the article was (clearly) created and expanded by SPA/COI profiles, with an overtly promotional intent, is also very difficult to overlook.... Guliolopez (talk) 12:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 13:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 13:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not notable. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, clearly not notable. Spleodrach (talk) 23:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Non-notable company based in Ireland. ThisGuy (talk to me // contributions) 20:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete - the two Irish Times articles are reliable, as a Newspaper of record, but don't quite make it to significant coverage. Ping me if you find more sources. Bearian (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't identify any notability here. The company falls at five Wikipedia policy hurdles, identified in preceding comments. Spideog (talk) 21:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.