The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EverMarkets Exchange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable blockchain related Company. Don't see multiple significant articles from reliable sources. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This looks like undisclosed native advertising. Creator notified of sanctions. MER-C 09:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of buzz. Quoting from the text, "EMX was founded in 2017 and...will open...in late 2018." Can't you wait even a few months?! -The Gnome (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Fails everything including WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If a subject fails everything perhaps that makes it notable. -The Gnome (talk) 08:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Understood. Thank you all for the feedback. It all makes sense and, while I can improve the article now, perhaps it makes more sense to wait until the company can pass more of the tests down the road. Full disclosure: I was not paid for this. dtdiaz805 16:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.