The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 21:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Espen Hagh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD: Fails WP:NFOOTBALL (his single 14-minute substitute appearance in the top division of Norwegian football, 25 years ago, was before the league was 'fully professional'. The sources linked in the article point to trivial coverage falling well short of WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one appearance is insufficient when GNG is failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete total failure of GNG. We need to stop being footballpedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - seems borderline. @Bring back Daz Sampson:, @GiantSnowman: - these sources seem to be a bit more than just trivial mentions even though they're all from a local paper with a reasonably low circulation [1] [2] [3] Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources found. GiantSnowman 10:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the sources that I linked above, in addition to the offline ones in the article, should be enough. The article's sources seem to contain a lot of non-routine info about the player such as "He was noted as having the team's highest O2 uptake of 76" and "In 1998 he commenced physiotherapy studies in Berlin", suggesting that they are more than just passing mentions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I think the sources provided are sufficient for GNG. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 10:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources provided.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.