Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Balayev
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 20:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Emil Balayev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD contested because "he played few more times….. stats needs to be updated" but this was not in a fully pro league, so sufficient notability is absent. C679 15:26, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 15:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Player has not played in fully professional league, nor played senior international football, so fails NFOOTY. No indication of any other achievements garnering significant reliable coverage to achieve GNG. Azerbaijan league is no longer considered FPL. Also unclear how someone with so few appearaqnces could pass GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.