The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

El Marg SC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to establish notability as per WP:CLUB and WP:SPORTCRIT. Sole source is an Arabic website about local sports clubs. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, the author clearly put a lot of work into the article. I would be more than happy to withdraw my AfD nomination if he/she can just add some sources and text that establishes notability. My main problem is that I don't speak or read Arabic and I fear any such sources would be in that language. Help from any Arabic speaking editors would be appreciated.-Ad Orientem (talk) 04:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. czar · · 05:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CLUB. Walls of Jericho (talk) 17:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep While a lot of work was put into this, some sourcing can be found, but not much to meet GNG or N. Here is one.[1] I cannot find too much in Arabic, but I don't know where or how to look effectively. I'd like this to get a fair shot. As more is likely to be verified by local paper sources. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Regardless of the amount of work put in I can find nothing on rsssf to indicate that they have taken part in a national cup and they haven't been in a top division either so they seem to fail GNG and NCLUB. Fenix down (talk) 08:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - independent notability not established. C679 22:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seems like it's been given a WP:CHANCE and nothing has come of it for two weeks. Mkdw^talk 05:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.