The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:43, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Down & Dirty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm still fairly new to using this site, but I've seen queries for deleted pages and by what I'm seen for deleted bands, I can easily say that I doubt this band can pass for any valid inclusion either.

They don't even have their album out, they're not signed and every source on this page is a YouTube link. Second Skin (talk) 22:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - can't see how the band could possibly pass WP:GNG having found nearly nothing beyond Facebook pages and Twitter accounts which certainly wouldn't be considered significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I would suggest the associated act, Make Me Famous, probably also isn't notable enough to be covered here either. Stalwart111 00:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete the band that the frontman originally belonged to does pass WP:MUSIC as the album it produced made the Billboard 200 [1]. The band's breakup did seem to draw some attention in the metal scene (a Google search of the frontman's name showed this), and it would not surprise me if the band actually became notable at some point in the future. All that being said, I could not find any reliable sources or substantial coverage of the band, and it seems to me that it fails WP:MUSIC now. If someone else could find independent reliable sources, I would gladly change me !vote to keep, but as for now it should be deleted, and then if it becomes notable, recreated. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:BAND and lacks the coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 21:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as having on in depth coverage in independent reliable sources as required by the WP:GNG. If such sources get added to the article. feel free to ping me. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.