The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Lauffer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability. Slashme (talk) 16:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nominator: Comment: This is a self-created page which is essentially someone's CV. I don't see anything in it which even claims notability according to WP:PROF. --Slashme (talk) 16:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Striking delete vote -- nomination is already considered to be a vote for delete. (it doesn't look like it will matter either way though). -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 06:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Entirely self-sourced, complete with trademarked catchphrase and signature. No evidence of passing WP:PROF. Could plausibly be speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G11 as unambiguous self-promotion. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No sign of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete per all above. I wish we could had a CSD for "resume", but we do not...Tazerdadog (talk) 19:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Echoing "resume" sentiment: not an encyclopaedia article. Fylbecatulous talk 21:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: same as what everyone else is saying, nothing of importance. Surprise it has been here so long. Wgolf (talk) 18:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.