The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dorm Soccer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing but social media and blogging sites. Might be made up by the creator. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dorm Soccer exists all over the world, but there isn't a standard name for it. That's why it was put up here, to have a standard name and definition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damiobash (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is meant to document topics that are already notable. We don't promote or define topics that have not yet received coverage in reliable sources. A blog would be a better choice of platform. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete An unreferenced article about a neologism that fails the General notability guideline. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - completely non-notable. GiantSnowman 13:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - completely non-notable and borderline nonsense -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Could not be less notable or more nonsensical if it tried. Per the above arguments. Fenix down (talk) 12:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Even if it becomes notable in the future, and there are several people trying to force the trend, it's not notable yet. SPACKlick (talk) 12:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.