The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diversicom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP/WP:CORPDEPTH. Not a lot of coverage located on a search - mostly business listings and one source that appeared promising until I realized it was a novel.

It's also important to be aware of false positives. According to this article, the company didn't rebrand as Diversicom until 1999, so any sources about Diversicom before that are not applicable to this company. I was not able to find any significant coverage of it as "Melrose Telephone Company" either. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is one of those topic companies that doesn't appear to be notable in their own right but at the same time has some historic significance and should perhaps be mentioned if there was an article on the history of local exchange carriers or similar. The lack of sources means it fails NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails wp:org. Behind the moors (talk) 11:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.