The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Just a note, User:guninvalid, no one has given a reason why this would be a Speedy Delete and once an article has been the subject of an AFD, it can not be PROD'd. Please review policy on our deletion processes before participating further in CSD, PRODs or AFDs/RFDs/CFDs/etc. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Devstacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Save for this Pitchfork album review I can't find any WP:significant coverage of this person in reliable sources. Certainly none of the three sources currently in the article qualify as such Mach61 00:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Massachusetts. Mach61 00:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No WP:SIGCOV. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 03:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a speedy delete. None of the sources listed are worth considering. guninvalid (talk) 09:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively, this could go to WP:PROD. guninvalid (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt. User does not appear to be interested in collaborative efforts, following policies, or engaging in discussion. I'm assessing this as probable self promotion. If user changes attitude and fixes the issues, I have no problem with restarting this article. Buffs (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @Buffs I would be against salting, it's plausible this rapper could become notable in the future. Mach61 21:01, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Easy enough to undo that should notability be established. Buffs (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Please see WP:CRYSTALBALL. The same could be said of literally anything and everything. Just because someone could become notable in the future doesn't warrant having an article in the present. guninvalid (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I think you may have misread. We're talking about salting the article name, not notability. Deletion isn't a debate at this point. Buffs (talk) 18:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Subject does not (yet) meet WP:MUSICBIO. Miniapolis 23:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.