The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deji (Youtuber) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unknown YouTuber; please peruse the history to see the historic amount of fluff (sourced to YouTube and Twitter) I scrapped from the article. Drmies (talk) 18:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Internet, Nigeria, and United Kingdom. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Television. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, if only for WP:TNT. Also possible is Redirect to KSI. Note Draft:Deji Olatunji. --Muhandes (talk) 19:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: noting Deji Olatunji and Oladeji Olatunji are salted, I withdraw the Redirect and suggest Salt. --Muhandes (talk) 08:48, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:GNG. KidAd • SPEAK 21:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Previous AFDs on this person are here and here, both had Delete decisions and Deji Olatunji has administrative protection from recreation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And while I think the article should be deleted, I wanted to tell Drmies that he is far from unknown hence the repeated efforts of editors to create an article about him on Wikipedia. I mean, he has over 10 million subscribers on YouTube, he has a big fan following. But I wouldn't call him "Wikipedia notable". Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:GNG. ManaliJain (talk) 12:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is at least the 7th or so AFD under various names for this utterly non-notable YouTuber. I've previously made a lengthy argument and I stand by it: merely being related to another notable YTer and appearing on said channel is not enough to pass our silly low-bar for notability. CUPIDICAE💕 17:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deji (YouTuber), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oladeji Olatunji, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deji Olatunji Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy Shorts Gamer. I can recall countless other discussions elsewhere about this and more than a dozen deletions. CUPIDICAE💕 17:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so there are even more than the 2 previous AFDs that I found. His fans are nothing if not persistent. This might call for a liberal sprinkling of salt. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given how difficult it was to keep track of these (I know there's at least one or two more that I can't remember) I think leaving it...unseasoned may be best for tracking purposes. CUPIDICAE💕 22:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Praxidicae, holy moly! I'm wondering if this isn't a matter to be handled by a filter. Do you know a filter person? Thanks. Drmies (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt — Per Drmies nom rationale. Fails GNG + This is a blatant ADMASQ. Celestina007 (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's clear he doesn't meet any WP notability criteria. I'm also for salting, but it might me tricky to do given the willingness to recreate this article under a variety of titles. Papaursa (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Notable for being a youtuber with a couple million subscribers, but I don't think wikipedia-notable LockzZ (talk) 22:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I do not think the subject has the level of notability that would merit an article as has been argued by others above. Dunarc (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.