Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debbie Rothstein
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 22:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Debbie Rothstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe this person does not meet WP:A7, however my speedy deletion was contested. Not sure she is notable per WP:ENT. signed, SpringProof talk 20:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Women. signed, SpringProof talk 20:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre, Video games, Anime and manga, California, and Minnesota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: to qualify for speedy deletion under A7, the article must not make any credible claim of importance. Both this and the Bob Papenbrook article clearly claim importance, and do so credibly. Whether that claim is supported by sources, and amounts to notability per WP:GNG or WP:ENT is a separate question - one for AfD, not for speedy deletion. Please reserve A7 tags for pages where the unanswered question is why the person is important, not where the unanswered question is whether they actually are. Owen× ☎ 20:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Couldn't locate sources to establish notability. Esw01407 (talk) 02:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Her voice acting credits are all things like "additional voices". "A Faery Hunt" turns up advertising before it turns up news. Highly unlikely to pass WP:GNG. -- asilvering (talk) 21:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.