The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Myerson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Internet search did not produce sourcing that was sufficient to satisfy the notability guidelines. (FWIW: First Afd, in 2007, resulted in No Consensus) Sal2100 (talk) 18:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete none of the coverage rises to the level we need for an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 00:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:17, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.