Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Breese
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dave Breese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's enough to avoid an A7 and a past version for his company (since redirected) survived a speedy . That said, I can find no evidence of his notability. All info ties into his own organizations and I can find no evidence of his inclusion in/coverage by secondary sources independent to his own company. StarM 23:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He is a published author by Moody Press. That's who published the 7 Men Who Rule the World from the Grave Book. Timtom27 (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- I think he probably meets the limits of notability, though the article needs more citations to support the significance of what he is said to have done as a young man. This is an artivcle in need of improvement, not one for deletion, and should be tagged accordingly. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'd be happy to consider withdrawing if someone provides evidence of said notability that don't come from his own organization. StarM 01:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Aside from a record of his publications which match up on Amazon, the majority of the information on Dave Breese is pre-internet. However, in False Teachers, he has a section which basically relays much of what is claimed in the article and proceeds to attack his interpretations and speeches. [1] Though I must state, Christian Destiny is a website for the organization he founded, so that is probably a bad source. Though other ones do exist from google searches. The article needs to be improved, not deleted. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User:Peterkingiron.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.