The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Bizzigotti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No useful references in the current article. Former band appears of shaky notability at best. No gnews hits. Under 200 unique ghits, and all appear to be either trivial, or not independent (own sites or vendors or sonsor sites), or unreliable (fora, blogs). Does not appear to pass WP:MUSIC. on the edge of an A7 Speedy delete tag. DES ^(talk) 10:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per my nom unless independent reliable sources with non-trivial coverage are found and cited that clearly establish notability. DES ^(talk) 10:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:MUSIC. not notable. no sources.. Outback the koala (talk) 05:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.