The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Boldo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paralympic competitor who failed to medal. Fails WP:NOLYMPICS and WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. JTtheOG (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. JTtheOG (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. JTtheOG (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:NTRACK which states athletics athletes are presumed notable if they have competed in the Olympics. NemesisAT (talk) 08:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @NemesisAT: Subject never competed at the Summer Olympics. He is a Paralympic athlete. They are not the same event. A discussion about the notability of Paralympic competitors is currently going on at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) if you would like to add your input. JTtheOG (talk) 09:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:NOLYMPICS per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 12:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per NemesisAT. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 00:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No Great Shaker (talk) 04:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. My presumption is that paralympic athletes *should* be notable, but that when the question is raised we should check whether they actually are notable, according to GNG. In this case, all I can find is [1]. I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. While they are presumed to be notable, notability is demonstrated, not inherited. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.