Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Roxxi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Needs work, but consensus is to keep.Mojo Hand (talk) 05:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- DJ Roxxi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Edited mostly by single-purpose accounts with an apparent conflict of interest. No references to establish notability. Keφr 14:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep COI issues can be fixed by editing. There's photos of newspaper/magazine articles about her on her website [1], I haven't traced them all but it suggests the coverage is out there if someone looks for it. The papers look like they count as reliable sources as do some of the magazines e.g. cosmopolitan. Won a global DJ award in 2012 (Global Spin Award). I don't know where to find South African music charts but I'd be surprised if she hasn't charted at least on a genre specific chart per criteria 4 in WP:BAND. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acb314 (talk • contribs) 15:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per acb Pass a Method talk 18:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Additional evidence of WP:GNG notability (found in an early revision of the article) includes this article and this article. There's also this and this and this, all of which appears to be significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 20:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Tentative delete per WP:TNT until somebody adds in the approriate sources and makes some sense of this article. Bearian (talk) 21:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.