Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Layla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. slakrtalk / 02:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Layla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any particular indication of notability, as defined by WP:MUSICBIO or WP:BIO. As of now, our "sources" are a blog post and some cruft, which hardly count as the "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" demanded by the relevant guidelines. - Biruitorul Talk 21:58, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Charting on a national chart passes WP:MUSIC GuzzyG (talk) 03:05, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I disagree: WP:NMUSIC is a guideline; it says right in the introduction that someone meeting the criteria "may be notable". Now, if we had "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and independent of the musician", that would make the subject notable, especially when combined with the charted song. But given that all we have are scraps of trivia, and that the single evidence for charting we have is this, the very essence of cruft — well, that's a pretty thin reed on which to hang a claim of notability. So thin, I would say, that it snaps under any sort of scrutiny. Given that no reliable sources have bothered to cover the subject in any sort of depth, there really isn't any reason for us to do so. - Biruitorul Talk 02:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 23:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Biruitorul, I guess that in your opinion only Mozart or Elvis are "of encyclopedic caliber". I doubt that DJ Layla is less notable than other DJs from Category:DJs. She is mentioned by many sources, including http://www.mtv.ro/video/interviu/interviu-cu-dj-layla-si-alissa-la-galeria-115.html, ProTV Chișinău ([2]) or bestmusic.ro (6th music site in Romania, with 45,000 unique visitors/week). 217.31.41.8 (talk) 07:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Taking part in a softball "interview" on MTV is not an indication of notability; neither is routine coverage (about the subject's marriage, or a show, or other news items of passing interest). - Biruitorul Talk 13:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Although that is a blog, I deem it reliable. Under the circumstances (no official Romanian single chart anymore), this seems to be a true archive of the charts as published at the time when they were official. The musician passes WP:MUSBIO #2, notability has been established. It would be nice, though, to find and add some sources with more info about DJ Layla herself. Kraxler (talk) 12:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.