Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Peaks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:16, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Crystal Peaks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable shopping centre, Fails NCORP & GNG –Davey2010Talk 17:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I have added sources that establish its notability Eckerslike (talk) 10:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Their great however usually with shopping centres their should be about 7/8 sources by now, If you can find more I'll happily close this but as it stands there's still no evidence of notability. –Davey2010Talk 00:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- DElete -- Meadowhall and shopping centres of similar size are notable. Other retail parks (US malls) are not. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep notable enough to have a page. I have seen much worse, like for instance Manchester Fort. MFriedman (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Other articles being worse has no relevance to this AFD. –Davey2010Talk 00:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Google book search finds some coverage, almost certainly enough in addition to existing sources. If not, it would be possible to merge to Mosborough (ward)#Waterthorpe. Peter James (talk) 21:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- Having searched "Crystal Peaks sheffield" the only thing I'm finding are store directories/addresses .... so there's barely any coverage at all, I'd oppose a merge simply because half of this article is already at Mosborough_(ward)#Waterthorpe so closing as merge would be quite pointless when there's nothing to merge, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 00:57, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Weak keep I'm generally very skeptical of local shopping centre articles (they tend to be full of local sources about Easter bunnies and whatnot as claims to notability.) The only reason I am going keep here is because the coverage that exists mentions attendance and actual store openings and closings that cover the mall and are barely enough to pass WP:ORG in my mind. I also wouldn't cry if this article was deleted, however, but if asked to come down on one side, I'd have to say keep it. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.