Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corentin Rahier
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Corentin Rahier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable figure skater. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Skating, and France. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The one secondary source already in the article (source 2) combined with [[1]] and [[2]] appear to contain enough coverage of Rahier to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please note that the 2017 Junior Worlds Field Guide: Ice Dance article is from a blog site run by a single person. As such it is most likely not deemed a reliable source per WP:SPORTBASIC. The other two sources look okay at a glance. Alvaldi (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Good catch there. Let'srun (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please note that the 2017 Junior Worlds Field Guide: Ice Dance article is from a blog site run by a single person. As such it is most likely not deemed a reliable source per WP:SPORTBASIC. The other two sources look okay at a glance. Alvaldi (talk) 13:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: The subject seems familiar, I suggest the article be worked on instead given the references provided by Liz
- Cameremote, I don't know what you are talking about, I didn't provide any references, I just relisted this discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: The subject seems to be familiar to me. KOLANO12 3 17:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Kolano123, the subject "seeming" to be familiar is not a reason for Keeping an article. This is also what Cameremote stated. What did you think of the sourcing? Did you search for any additional sources? If you are not going to spend time investigating the article and its sources, please do not comment. Liz Read! Talk! 00:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)