The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 10:15, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck Grant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. TheLongTone (talk) 16:01, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete An example of pure, likely professionally written puffery. No in-depth sources. Notability is not inherited: most of the major sources are about her sister. I removed five sources: Youtube, IMDB, an NYTimes source that did not even mention the subject. GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 09:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete as per nom.TH1980 (talk) 03:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable yet, maybe someday valereee (talk) 15:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:CREATIVE.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.