The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catalina Cruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsalvageably inadequate BLP of a porn performer. No independent reliable sourcing. No actual assertion of notability. Does not even rise to the level of porncruft. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:BASIC without significant secondary RS coverage. Niche award category would not have passed WP:PORNBIO, and it certainly fails WP:ENT. Independent search for sources yielded only quotes and brief mentions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails WP:ENT / WP:BASIC. PORNBIO has been deprecated & there's nothing better. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:20, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia made many horrible decisions to keep articles on people who were not at all notable in 2007. The decision to keep this article was one such horrible decision.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.