Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caly Bevier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to America's Got Talent (season 11)#Top 36 acts. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caly Bevier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a singer, whose only substantive or reliably sourced claim of notability is having been a non-winning competitor on a reality show. Nothing else here passes WP:NMUSIC at all: she has yet to release her debut recording, the live appearances sourced here are all in Toledo, Ohio (which her hometown is a suburb of), and every single reference here is either a primary source that cannot assist notability at all, or local coverage in Toledo's local media. As always, every musician is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because she exists -- she has to achieve something that satisfies WP:NMUSIC, and have the reliable source coverage to support it, for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 00:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect can still be created from the redlink if desired. But the reason I listed it for deletion rather than redirection per se is that there's no valid or substantive reason to retain the article's content in the edit history of the title or to merge any more of the content from here than the target already contains. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  14:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, redirect, or delete & redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Traintalk 20:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.