The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:40, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C. D. Baker (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I am also dubious of his merit. The whole thing reads as if it was written by the publisher as a blurb. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Clearly a case of WP:COI, just as the article states, that content about the subject was "provided by PrestonSpeed Publications." A Google search turned up zero coverage, other than a Q&A in Today's Christian Woman, an evangelical Christian periodical and website, which is not enough to pass WP:GNG. Also fails WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we clearly had way too loose creation criteria back in 2006 when this article was created, and have clearly not adequately reviewed articles for inclusion since. It amazes me how many articles that have been around well over 10 years come here to AfD that have exactly 0 reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.