Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BusinessF1 Magazine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- BusinessF1 Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Short lived magazine that doesn't meet WP:GNG, as the only sources available concern libel cases. It also has significant verifiability and promotional problems, as it appears to be written by its former editor as a puff piece. QueenCake (talk) 18:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. As it stands, the article does not provide any sources to support notability. Ping me if this changes. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.