The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 16:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bottom feeder (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unecessessary disambiguation page. Only links to a single article. neon white talk 00:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Can't see any use for the page as long as the three other things mentioned don't have articles of their own. It's pointless to direct readers from Bottom feeder to Bottom feeder (disambiguation) for other uses when the other uses don't have articles. Matt (Talk) 07:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. dab pages that differ between two meanings should be made into hatnotes, pages themselves should differ between at least three meanings with articles. This dab lists only one page with an article and is thus useless. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I find this page very insulting. Brownsnout spookfish (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete I find the disambiguation page rather unnecessary. Peridon (talk) 19:22, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, articles listed are not ambiguous with "bottom feeder". -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.