The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bhutan national futsal team. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bhutan national futsal team results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In my view, the summary of Bhutan's competitive futsal record in Bhutan national futsal team is completely sufficient and this article is excessive statistical detail for a team playing in a minor sport that has yet to even draw or win a match! An exhaustive results listing is not the done thing on Wikipedia, even for the more successful futsal teams. I would oppose merging the content to the parent article as the content is sourced to permanent dead links so there is a clear WP:V concern. The only sources that I can find are all primary, such as AIMAG 2013, which contributes nothing towards a WP:GNG claim. I can't find any evidence of coverage from secondary sources and, for most of the matches, even primary sources seem to be impossible to locate. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Lists, and Asia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:33, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 13:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/Redirect. Merge the content to the Bhutan national futsal team article, or redirect to the same target. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would oppose a merge for now as the content is completely unsourced. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:05, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 15:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or possibly Redirect. Largely a page of stats. Merging unsourced material would violate verifiability. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NOTSTATS, effectively unsourced. Avilich (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.