The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bharati Ghosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has 5 sources. Of them 3 about her candidancy and other two are routine coverage. The article fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:NPOL, never elected. No major public post held.--DBigXrayᗙ 20:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:NPOL and WP:GNG fail. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NPOL, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:SOAP. Party officials are not automatically notable, and there is not enough coverage. Here wards are minor. There is an ongoing campaign, which she might win, but we are not a soap-box. Bearian (talk) 19:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.