The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagyavidhaata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't cite any WP:RS and doesn't meet WP:GNG, hence should be deleted

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, India, and Bihar. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No reliable sources and a simple search does not show any reliable sources with significant coverage and reviews by critics on the serial. The page fails WP:GNG and WP:NTV. RangersRus (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.