The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 02:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Wyatt (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Had already been deleted. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY (for now). Can be drafted until he makes his League Two debut for Sutton. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify per nom - as a lifelong Us fan, I look forward to seeing national news sources producing coverage for every Sutton player this season. Wyatt will very likely meet notability guidelines at some point in the next year but I don't see enough for WP:GNG right now so draft space is for the best. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify fails WP:GNG, but may be okay at some point in the near future, as he's signed to a fully professional club. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Draft per above. Govvy (talk) 18:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or Draftify. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Can be created if he receives enough significant coverage to pass GNG. Alvaldi (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify - I think this is someone who is reasonably likely to meet GNG soon, but does not meet it at the present time. Dunarc (talk) 22:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Fenix down: How is there not consensus to draftify from the comments above? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.